The religious perception, or insight, which may be expressed by art is that the well-being of humanity depends on social harmony and understanding. Thus, art is "universal" if it expresses religious feelings. Therefore, art must aim to be "universal." Art is "universal" if it expresses thoughts and feelings which can be experienced by every human being.Īccording to Tolstoy, everyone may experience religious thoughts or feelings. Art is relevant to every aspect of the human condition. Tolstoy’s concept of "universal" art affirms that art is relevant to everyone. Any attempt to teach art leads to an attempt to imitate other works of art. To teach art is to destroy the individuality of the artist. He argues that to teach art is to destroy its spontaneity. Tolstoy does not believe that art can be taught, or that instruction in the practice of art can help people to communicate their thoughts and feelings more sincerely. Tolstoy argues that any explanation of such thoughts and feelings is superfluous, because art ultimately communicates feelings and experiences in a way which cannot be expressed by any words. Tolstoy also claims that interpretation or criticism of art is irrelevant and unnecessary, because any good work of art is able to express thoughts and feelings which can be clearly understood by most people. Tolstoy claims that professionalism causes a lack of sincerity in the artist, and argues that if an artist must earn a living by producing art, then the art which is produced is more likely to be false and insincere. The "highest" feelings which art may express are related to religious perception. 3 Any true work of art expresses original thoughts and feelings. "Bad art" is shallow, repetitious, crude, clumsy, contrived, melodramatic, pretentious, or banal.Īccording to Tolstoy, the most important quality of any work of art is its sincerity. In contrast, "bad art" lacks unity of form and content with the ideas and feelings which it tries to evoke or represent. "Good art" has a form and content which are in unity with the ideas and feelings which it evokes or represents. 1 He also argues that if it is not admitted that art must be intelligible and comprehensible, then any unintelligible or incomprehensible expression of thoughts or feelings may be called "art." If any incomprehensible form of personal expression may be called "art," then the definition of art gradually loses its meaning, until it has no meaning at all. Indeed, he claims that a great work of art is only great if it can be understood by everyone. Tolstoy believes that art is good if it is judged to be good by the majority of people. To the contrary, good art can communicate its meaning to most people, because it expresses its meaning in a way which can be understood by everyone. Good art is not confusing and incomprehensible to most people. The more that art restricts itself to a particular audience, the more obscure and incomprehensible it becomes to people outside that particular audience. Bad art is unintelligible and incomprehensible. Tolstoy criticizes the belief that art is only relevant to a particular class of society, saying that this is a misconception which can lead to obscurity and decadence in art.Īccording to Tolstoy, good art is intelligible and comprehensible. To limit the subject matter of art to the experiences of a particular class of society is to deny that art can be important for all of society. Art does not belong to any particular class of society. Tolstoy defines art as an expression of a feeling or experience in such a way that the audience to whom the art is directed can share that feeling or experience. Art is a means of communication, and is an important means of expression of any experience, or of any aspect of the human condition. The aim of art is not merely to produce beauty, or to provide pleasure, enjoyment, or entertainment. Beauty cannot be defined objectively, and therefore cannot be used as a criterion to define what is, or is not, art. For Tolstoy, aesthetic values are defined by moral values.Īccording to Tolstoy, art cannot be defined as an activity which produces beauty. Tolstoy does not define art in terms of its ability to express form and beauty, but instead defines art in terms of its ability to communicate concepts of morality. Leo Tolstoy’s What is Art? (1896) is a treatise concerning the nature and purpose of art, describing how art can express moral values.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |